SYDNEY Aus

New South Wales Election Race Deadlocked

Perhaps the biggest appeal of a minority government is that both major parties will need to work together to achieve their campaign pledges.

That’s appealing because the major parties have proven very poor at compromise. Meaning in a minority government, less will get done. And when it comes to government, we’re firmly in the camp that less is almost always more.

In either case, New South Wales could soon discover the pros and cons of a minority government after polling revealed the race for the state election has tightened over controversial key issues.

Is this it for Australia’s unblemished, 27-year growth record? Download the free report now.

The results are in…

It’s less than two weeks until the state election, and Labor and Liberal are at a deadlock. It’s  50–50 on a two-party preferred basis, according to a Newspoll released by The Australian yesterday.

However, this statistic may not add up.

Another poll, this one helmed by The Sydney Morning Herald, found that almost 58% of voters were attracted to Labor’s promise of climate change addressment — having them lead 51–49.

Revealing that apparently the everyday Australian believes that eight million residents can offset the staggering increases in emissions estimated to come from the 2.8 billion Indians and Chinese over the coming decade, AAP reports.

It’s like pulling a plastic water gun on a bonfire.

Questions left unanswered

The issue dominated yesterday’s campaign for Premier Gladys Berejiklian and Labor leader Michael Daley.

Ms Berejiklian believes that the Coalition is best to strike a balance between emissions and energy resilience.

Mr Daley, however, said that Prime Minister Scott Morrison was widely known for brandishing a lump of coal around federal parliament.

It seems that the Coalition’s highly controversial plan in approving the demolition of Sydney’s Alliance Stadium has become a central issue — in the debate, helmed by Labor, questioning whether the restructure was a wise use of public money.

Or whether it was another excuse for something to look new and shiny.

Additionally, the Liberal Party is yet to disclose whether Treasurer Dominic Perrottet properly admitted a $2,300 donation from his former employer, law firm Henry Davis York.

However, Mr Perrottet has again defended his actions, promising the donation would be disclosed in due course if proper procedure had not been followed.

As the clock ticks onward, these questions will only become more demanding.

PS: If you’re more than a few years away from retirement, your job could potentially be at risk of being automated. This free report details the changes you could expect to see in the workplace. And some steps you could take to ensure you — and your children — are well placed in the age of automation.

The Australian Tribune Editorial

The Australian Tribune Editorial

The Australian Tribune is an unorthodox news service. Your Australian Tribune editorial team deliver the unfiltered stories that could impact your daily life — political and economic stories you’re unlikely to get anywhere else. And we’re not afraid to step on some toes to do it. We are honest, conservative and never dull. We are an independent service, meaning we don’t answer to shareholders or outside advertisers. This helps avoid conflicts of interest that inhibit mainstream sources, which keeps our voice independent. The Australian Tribune is owned and operated by Port Phillip Publishing.
The Australian Tribune Editorial

Latest posts by The Australian Tribune Editorial (see all)

Comments: 1

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

  1. Just compare the ship-shape state of NSW, under last Labor stewardship, when the Crew jumped ship together with the rats; with the state it is in now. The Ship has undergone a rapid transformation. Nothing is worse than what The Labor had left behind. Improvement is everywhere, though not all of it is to our liking. But, if the Fed Gov brings the people in, well, it the states that must house them.
    OK, that is roughly the state of The State. Now, can someone explain why the Ship’s Passengers want to change the Crew? I suspect that a small percentage of the Passengers vote discerningly, or they to easily forget and want to keep it fair share in the governance.
    JL