P.Klimkin, B.Johnson and W.Waszczykowski press conference in Kie

Boris Johnson Mocks Doom Sayers Over No-Deal Brexit

The Deep State, or ‘establishment figures’, as former British foreign minister Boris Johnson calls them, has run a lengthy and effective fear campaign over the fallout from Brexit.

And a no-deal Brexit — one which would see the UK leave the EU without a formal withdrawal deal in place — tops the list of what Johnson mockingly calls the establishment’s ‘apocalyptic’ forecasts.

Johnson, along with other Conservative Eurosceptics, is convinced Prime Minister Theresa May’s government is over-exaggerating the danger of a no-deal Brexit as a means to get the votes she needs for her withdrawal plan to pass in parliament this upcoming week.

Free Report: How Tax Freedom Day could be impacting you. Download now.

May uses fear to coax in further support

Clearly falling short of unanimous support from her fellow MPs regarding her Brexit plans, we’ve been witnessing first hand in the past couple of months the struggle May has faced in keeping enough people on board with her leadership.

The Confidence vote alone showed 117 people in her Conservative party no longer supporting her ambitions for the UK.

And it’s somewhat understandable, seeing as a crux aspect of May’s withdrawal deal is ensuring little change in Britain–EU relations — which essentially undermines the purpose of Brexit.

It seems Johnson believes May is aware of the unappealing nature of the deal, for her tactics in gaining support are through fear of what could become of the UK if no such exit deal is put in place come 29 March.

Thus, rather than convince them of the benefits of her deal, May is instead highlighting the consequences of having no deal at all.

As Johnson wrote in his column for the Daily Telegraph (a pro-Conservative publication):

Establishment figures have taken to the airwaves to warn of the perils of rejecting Theresa May’s lamentable withdrawal agreement; and we now have a cumulative forecast that is downright apocalyptic.’

May exaggerates no-deal Brexit consequences

Judging by the words being thrown around in the media, ‘apocalyptic’ is not an exaggeration of the level in which this fear campaign is being broadcasted.

Dame Caroline of the Conservative party told BBC Radio 4:

Crashing out of the EU without a deal will cause job losses and bring to an end the renaissance of manufacturing that we’ve seen in regions like mine in the West Midlands, and both Jack Dromey and I know the human interest and impact of this.’

May herself has used the phrase ‘uncharted territory’ to describe the future state of the UK if her deal is rejected by parliament this week.

It’s certainly over-the-top, but this sort of language seems to be working.

Over 200 MPs from the House of Commons have signed a letter insisting that May take the prospect of a no-deal Brexit off the table.

But Boris Johnson is convinced the British public don’t possess the same fear of a deal-less exit from the EU.

Voters aren’t afraid of a no-deal Brexit

As DPA reports, Johnson has pointed out that opinion poll results show ‘the so-called no-deal option … is gaining in popularity’ despite the vocal endorsement of May’s deal.

Johnson believes voters — those who initiated this Brexit in the first place — are not convinced of the fear propaganda. And for good reason, as Johnson explains:

The most obvious answer, perhaps, is that this [no-deal] option is closest to what people actually voted for.

They didn’t vote for anything like Theresa May’s Withdrawal Agreement. They voted to come out.

The parliamentary vote on May’s Brexit deal was postponed four weeks from its initial schedule, for May was aware she would have faced a heavy defeat if the vote occurred back in December.

She probably thought her fear campaign needed more time to take effect. But perhaps four weeks wasn’t long enough.

PS: The tax burden on Australians has grown by leaps and bounds in our lifetime, and shows little sign of reversing. You may think you know who’s responsible for rising taxes. But as we reveal in our free new report — ‘What you could do to stop Australia’s Tax Freedom Day from blowing out even further in 2018’ — you may have it all wrong…Click here for more.

The Australian Tribune Editorial

The Australian Tribune Editorial

The Australian Tribune is an unorthodox news service. Your Australian Tribune editorial team deliver the unfiltered stories that could impact your daily life — political and economic stories you’re unlikely to get anywhere else. And we’re not afraid to step on some toes to do it. We are honest, conservative and never dull. We are an independent service, meaning we don’t answer to shareholders or outside advertisers. This helps avoid conflicts of interest that inhibit mainstream sources, which keeps our voice independent. The Australian Tribune is owned and operated by Port Phillip Publishing.
The Australian Tribune Editorial

Latest posts by The Australian Tribune Editorial (see all)

Comments: 3

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

  1. What would Churchill think of the spineless UK government & its handling of Brexit. The cheapest option is to leave without a deal. The money that will be saved by not having to fund the E U parliament & all the other snouts in the trough will soften any blow to jobs during the transition. Take back control before its too late.The UK will get back far more control of its own affairs than it looses. Hand back Northern Ireland to get rid of the burr under the saddle just as they have done with Hong Kong & other territories.

  2. Of course the Brexiteers who voted yes are not interested in what is best for Britain – they are only interested in what they think is a way to become a nationalist bastion. They are not a sophisticated electorate and have no idea what the cost to the economy and the way of life for the British as an isolationist island would be. They are a scared-to-submission rabble by the ultra conservatives as usual. Let’s hope the Australian majority is not as unsophisticated this year and can see through the “end-of-civilization” scaremongering keeping idiots in government.

  3. Now, reading Christiaan one would really think that it is the Right leaning governments that scaremonger. He reckons that lefties are God preferred half of the population, and that somehow they know what is the best for Earth and the Life. Is he not witnessing the “scaremongering” that is forcing UK to go again to the polls? “Well, we do not like this outcome, and we will not stop until we get it our way”. David has put it very well.
    What was the derogatory name that Ms Clinton called the US electorate? ‘Some people and groups like to use insults when they can’t sustain an argument’, noted 2000 years ago a well known thinker.
    JL