Why Britain Won’t Leave the EU

In 2016 the British voted in a referendum to leave the EU. Prime Minister David Cameron resigned and Theresa May was eventually elected into office.

One person who predicted this shock result was Samuel Tombs of Pantheon Macroeconomics.

But now, according to Business Insider, he thinks Britain won’t be leaving the EU. At all.

Port Phillip Insider editor Kris Sayce made a similar prediction back in April:

We’ve said from the start that we don’t believe Brexit will actually happen.

We just don’t buy the idea that the ‘Deep State’ and global bureaucracy will allow a sovereign nation (the UK) to leave the clutches of the European Union.

Tombs’ latest prediction is along the same lines. He believes that Britain and the EU will eventually reach a transition deal… But at the end of that process, the whole concept of Brexit might get dumped.

One major reason was a change in public sentiment. The poll back in June 2016 pushed the idea over the line with 51.9%.

Now, according to a YouGov report, the tables have turned. In a survey, only 42% responded that they thought Britain was right to leave the EU.

And with May and the EU struggling to agree on terms, Tombs might be spot on.

The Brexit negotiations have been troubled form the beginning.  The EU’s chief negotiator called Britain’s Brexit deal ‘impossible’. He claimed they wanted to retain the membership benefits of the EU without any of the restrictions.

At the moment, the big issue is Ireland. Because Northern Island is part of the UK, it is included in Brexit terms. But the Republic of Ireland, being a separate state, is staying.

In order to prevent a hard border with the Irish Republic, May hoped to keep some ‘regulatory alignment’ between the EU and Northern Ireland.

It didn’t go down well.

Without this alignment, goods and services will not be able to cross the border in Ireland easily. But introducing the alignment would influence regulations on the Irish Republic, who have not agreed to the proposal.

If the proposal sticks, this could be the end for Brexit.

Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon argued that if one part of the UK can ‘retain regulatory alignment with the EU and effectively stay in the single market,’ then other parts should have the same freedom.

Which is essentially proposing a UK-wide ‘soft’ version of Brexit.

With all the confusion, The Independent is arguing this might be the end for Theresa May.

Brittany Prentice

Brittany Prentice

Brittany Prentice is a skilled writer here at The Australian Tribune. She has a double degree in Literary Studies and Linguistics from Monash University. She has made contributions to language textbooks in Australia, and translation for robotics software in Japan. She has an appetite for sharing big ideas in business, finance, and politics both locally and around the world.

Comments: 2

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

  1. We just don’t buy the idea that the ‘Deep State’ and global bureaucracy will allow a sovereign nation (the UK) to leave the clutches of the European Union.’
    Kris, does anybody in Port Phillip Publishing want to go into REAL DEPTH! about what the statement above means!? [‘Deep State’ and global bureaucracy]

  2. Here is a clear example of why we here in Australia have the voting system we do…compulsory. If the UK had required all its citizens to engage when the vote was taken it is more than likely the present situation would not have eventuated.
    My friend and his wife in the UK voted to exit and have not changed their minds. Interestingly he works in the upper end of the financial world and has clear reasons for his actions.